Offended? Tell Marvel.

I don’t care if I get a rep as a “Feminized Male” for this post, I need to get something off of my chest.

First, go here. I won’t have the image display here because, frankly, I believe it to be offensive (some may consider Not Safe for Work).

I may have found the MJ statue a trifle “off”, but this isn’t a trifle “off”… this is full-on offensive. This can’t be fobbed off as “playful” or “silly” – this is a cover glorifying the victimization of woman. Even if one does not know that this is in a style reminiscent of “tentacle rape” pornography (why-oh-why did I know that?), the image is far, far from innocent.

Examine it for a moment with me, will you?

First ignore the ridiculously cartoonish body-types (an issue I have with this series to begin with – if the Heroes for Hire are not aliens, then there should be several exposes nipples).

Heck, let’s ignore the long phallus dripping clear liquid onto the Black Cat’s chest.

Discount that this book is rated “ages nine and up”.

Forget the fact that the three women on the cover (Black Cat, Misty Knight, and Colleen Wing), are supposed to be tough-as-nails-don’t-need-no-man-to-rescue-me women and instead of being shown as such are shown as whimpering damsels in distress. Leave alone the leering, glowing-eyed spectators.

You know what my biggest problem with this cover is?

There are male members of Heroes for Hire, You see the arm of one (Shang Chi, Master of Kung Fu) in this shot. Yet you don’t see him playing the victim. He’s in the back, where we can’t see him. The female team members are all twisted and contorted to present their tortured forms for the reader. There’s even a fourth female member whose breasts are showing (with a few wisps of hair, but hey, they managed to get her breasts in the shot! Good job!).

That’s what annoys me. The fact that you would never, ever see Marvel or DC make a cover like this with a male protagonist. Yes, a male hero may be shown in peril, but his face will be defiant. He won’t be shown as submissive. He won’t be shown as a victim. He’ll be shown as a Tough Guy who will Escape Any Minute.

They wouldn’t draw him on the cover as the impending victim of some unnamed torture, his secondary sexual characteristics on display, and covered in an unnamed translucent liquid, as people leer in the background. They just wouldn’t.

But hey, women? Fair game.

I’m reading some fairly weak defenses of this cover already. One person said “Well, mainstream magazines have fairly raunchy covers too.” Really? Find me one mainstream magazine – and no, if you hide it under your mattress it’s not mainstream – that would show an impending rape on their cover. Really. Because depending on how you look at this cover, the ladies are about to become victims or already have been. C’mon, show me. Show me a cover that features a cowering woman with her chest covered in an almost-clear fluid.

In fact, I challenge you to show me a mainstream magazine that shows women being victimized in any way on the cover. Lots of skin? Sure. Highly sexualized? Absolutely? Victimized? No. No magazine that isn’t kept in a black wrapper would have that. Even most “Gentleman’s Magazines” wouldn’t have such covers.

Comics have plenty of victimization of women going on, but this is just… blatant. It was bad enough when rape was being used as a throwaway-plot point in Identity Crises. It was worse when we got to hear the same character extolling the virtues of rape. Now we’re basically putting it right on the cover.

I’m not saying all comics have to be kid-friendly. I’m not even saying all super-hero comics do. I’m not saying we all need to bend over backwards so as to not offend someone. However, there’s such a thing as bending over backwards <b>to</b> offend people. There is simply no way that the cover is not offensive. None.

It’s time to say “enough”. Not just on blogs and forums. In the comic store. I ask any of you who would normally buy this comic to not buy this issue. Show Marvel that no, sex doesn’t always sell and yes, there is such a thing as bad publicity.

Marvel has a right to Free Speech, but so do we. Speak with your wallet, folks. Say no to this comic.



  • typolad

    fab,

    Actually, you’re dead wrong. I was rather specifically saying DON’T BUY THIS ONE ISSUE.

    Then again, of all my points you seem to have missed, that’s a minor one.

  • faboofour

    Lemme understand this: you wrote a five-hundred word essay saying “Don’t buy this one asparagus tip.” All the other asparagus tips are okay by you, then. According to you, this was a single out-of-the-ordinary anomoly? So rape fantasy is okay by you, just not this one occurance which was “a step too far”.

    But, wait: you also wrote “I find rape as a selling point for a story to be offensive”.

    So is it just this one attempt or ALL attempts to use rape as a selling point as a story that offends you? Is it all asparagus or just a single tip?

    Y’know, Typo, other than repeatedly contradicting yourself (first you say you’re tellng people not to buy the issue, then you say you’re not calling for a ban of anything, then you reverse youself AGAIN and admit you were telling people not to buy that issue), you really haven’t clarified the alleged “points” I seem to have missed.

    I read your essay as a call for a boycott of Marvel (okay, I’ll accept, against evidence to the contrary, that it was for that one asparagus tip, I mean, issue) because it was, in your belief, universally offensive (“There is simply no way that the cover is not offensive,” you wrote. “None.”). The majority of the words you wrote were in support of that theme. Frankly, I don’t really care why you found it universally offensive, any more than I care why, say, Pat Robertson or Bill O’Reilly or Rush Limbaugh finds things “universally offensive”.

    Don’t even try to tell me you weren’t calling for a boycott. It was an OVERT call for a boycott. “Speak with your wallet, folks,” you wrote. “Say no to this comic.”

    And don’t try to backpedal again and say that you weren’t saying “NO ONE ANYWHERE IS INTERESTED IN THIS!” The majority of your essay consisted in explaining how “[t]here is simply no way that the cover is not offensive. None.”

    Again: I read your essay as a call for a boycott of Marvel because the cover was, in your belief, universally offensive.

    And also again: there’s nothing wrong with that, Typo. You’re certainly allowed to believe that there is such a thing as “universal immutable morality.” I really don’t understand why you’re arguing that you didn’t say that.

    I always admit when I’m wrong. That’s called honesty. Tell me where I’m wrong, please, and I’ll go away.

  • http://www.jimmacq.com MacQuarrie

    There are two very similar words in English that mean very different things. To “censor” means to prevent somebody from expressing themselves in the way they choose. To “censure” means to criticize somebody for what they said and to hold them accountable for their words. The first is deadly, the second is vital.

    Typo is not suggesting that Marvel be censored, but he is advocating that they be censured. Calling for a boycott is not censorship. It is censuring. It is calling on people to hold a publisher accountable for what they have already published, not preventing them from publishing in the first place. If Marvel has made the decision that this is the kind of product they want to have associated with their name, readers are well within their rights to decide to no longer buy their product, and to suggest to others to do likewise. Marvel can publish whatever they want, but refusing to buy it is not censorship.

  • faboofour

    I never said Typo was calling for “censorship”. Someone else claimed I was by invoking Wertham, and I pointed out that Wertham never called for censorship. No, what Typo is advocating is no different than what Wertham advocated: the repression of the imagination of others based on one’s own moral grounds.

    I personally find that position extremely offensive, and I’ve said so, but I wouldn’t censure Typo for either holding or expressing that position.

    I’m simply asking him to call a spade a spade.

  • madwoman

    I know this is late, but Marvel pulled the image off their site.

  • http://vqezgdi.com/eiewyyke.html Thomas Hopkins

    hi
    03918bkwo090zhir
    good luck